torebuilders.blogg.se

Giving preferential treatment makes equal treatment unequal
Giving preferential treatment makes equal treatment unequal













giving preferential treatment makes equal treatment unequal

  • Prohibits the state, local governments, districts, public universities, colleges, and schools, and other government instrumentalities from discriminating against or giving preferential treatment to any individual or group in public employment, public education, or public contracting on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin.
  • Treatment by State and Other Public Entities. Prohibition Against Discrimination or Preferential. The following is the exit poll data on Proposition 209: Group The margin of error was 3 percent (but higher for some subgroups). On November 5, 1996, the Los Angeles Times conducted an exit poll of 2,473 voters who cast ballots in the general election at 40 polling places. Source Analyses Los Angeles Times exit poll If it had been approved, it would have repealed Proposition 209. over others." California Proposition 16 (2020) See also: California Proposition 16, Repeal Proposition 209 Affirmative Action Amendment (2020)Īt the election on November 3, 2020, voters decided Proposition 16. San Jose (2000), the California Supreme Court held that, within the context of Proposition 209, discrimination means "to make distinctions in treatment show partiality (in favor of) or prejudice (against)" and preferential means "a giving of priority or advantage to one person. San Jose (2000)Īftermath Hi-Voltage Wire Works v. Therefore, Proposition 209 banned the use of affirmative action involving race-based or sex-based preferences in California. Proposition 209 added Section 31 to the California Constitution's Declaration of Rights, which said that the state cannot discriminate against or grant preferential treatment on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, and public contracting. Proposition 209 was approved.Ī "yes" vote supported adding Section 31 to the California Constitution's Declaration of Rights, which said that the state cannot discriminate against or grant preferential treatment on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, and public contracting.Ī "no" vote opposed adding Section 31 to the California Constitution's Declaration of Rights, which said that the state cannot discriminate against or grant preferential treatment on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, and public contracting. California Proposition 209, the Affirmative Action Initiative, was on the ballot in California as an initiated constitutional amendment on November 5, 1996.















    Giving preferential treatment makes equal treatment unequal